Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JUNE 2016

Focus On Housing - May 2016

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Having served notice on the landlord pursuant to a break clause to determine the lease on 24 January 2012, the tenant paid the rent due for the full December 2011 to March 2012 quarter.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Welcome to the second in our 'Focus on Housing' series, in which our experienced teams bring you their insights into the many aspects of the ever-changing housing sector.

Beyond the break...

By Annabel Heath

A Supreme Court decision means that tenants paying a full quarter's rent in advance to ensure that they validly serve a break notice will not be entitled to a refund for the period after the break in relation to which they are not in occupation - unless, of course, the lease provides for it.

Background

Having served notice on the landlord pursuant to a break clause to determine the lease on 24 January 2012, the tenant paid the rent due for the full December 2011 to March 2012 quarter. About a week prior to the break date, the tenant paid an additional specified sum required as a condition of the break. The break conditions having been satisfied, the lease term ended on 24 January 2012. The tenant then sought repayment of the monies paid in advance,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from