Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2017

Does (Or Should) A Payment Notice Need To Evidence Intention?

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

We recently reported on a Technology and Construction Court decision highlighting that where validity of a pay less notice is in issue, both substantive content and the intention of the sender...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

We recently reported on a Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision highlighting that where validity of a pay less notice is in issue, both substantive content and the intention of the sender will be determinative. In this update, we review a subsequent Scottish decision which appears to take an inconsistent approach as to whether or not "intent" is needed at the point notices are given, in order for those notices to be compliant with the requirements of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 as amended (the Act).

Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust v Logan Construction (South East) Limited

As set out in our earlier report, in Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (the Trust) v Logan Construction (South East) Limited (Logan), one of the issues related to whether or not the Trust had issued a valid pay less notice. The decision on this point turned on whether the sender had the required 'intention' that the document issued should take

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from