Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2009

Difficulties In Recovering Overpayments

It is often assumed that overpayments to a contractor or subcontractor can be recovered, but the recent case of Furmans v Elecref shows that this is not always so.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Julian Bailey
Julian Bailey
Niall Tiernan
Niall Tiernan

It is often assumed that overpayments to a contractor or subcontractor can be recovered, but the recent case of Furmans v shows that this is not always so.

The relevant facts were:

  • A agreed to perform work for B for a daily rate. The agreement was relatively informal, and did not use any standard form of contract
  • Despite the daily rate being agreed, there was no agreement on the number of hours that A would work each day. B alleged that there was an agreement that A's personnel would work an 11 or 12 hour day, which A denied. A's personnel were only working a 9 hour day, which B said was inadequate
  • Despite its complaints that A wasn't working the required hours, B's site supervisor signed-off A's invoices, which were calculated using the daily rate. B paid these invoices. B also paid amounts claimed by A for worker accommodation, which A said weren't included in the daily rate - although B disagreed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from