Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2016

Concurrent Delay – Further Developments In The Saga

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

A recent case has brought concurrent delay, an area of law that continues to spark debate, back into focus. Broadly speaking, concurrent delay occurs where there is delay on a project...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Saga Cruises BDF Ltd v Fincantieri SpA [2016] EWHC 1875 (Comm)

A recent case has brought concurrent delay, an area of law that continues to spark debate, back into focus. Broadly speaking, concurrent delay occurs where there is delay on a project which is caused both by an event or events for which the Employer is responsible and by an event or events for which the Contractor is responsible. 

Issues then arise regarding whether the Contractor is entitled to an extension of time and loss and expense,  or whether instead the Employer is entitled to liquidated damages.

In the Saga Cruises case this situation arose.  Fincantieri (referred to throughout the judgment as "the Yard")  was contracted by Saga Cruises BDF Ltd ("Saga"), part of the Saga group to repair and refurbish a cruise ship. In accordance with the contract, as amended, the Yard was to deliver the ship, with the works to it complete, by 2 March 2012.  The ship was not delivered until 16 March 2012.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from