Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2023

Case Summary: Chug V Dhaliwal [2023] EWHC 804 (Ch)

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

In Chug v Dhaliwal [2023] EWHC 804 (Ch) the High Court considered the circumstances in which a tenant is prevented from challenging the lawfulness of forfeiture of a lease by peaceable re-entry.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In Chug v Dhaliwal [2023] EWHC 804 (Ch) the High Court considered the circumstances in which a tenant is prevented from challenging the lawfulness of forfeiture of a lease by peaceable re-entry.

The decision also provides a helpful reminder of the principles relating to waiver of the right to forfeit and the validity of s.146 notices.

Background

Mr and Mrs Dhaliwal were the freeholders of 358-360 Bath Road, Hounslow ("the Property"). In 2005 they granted a 20 year lease of the Property to Mr Chug. Mr Chug operated a homeware shop out of the Property ("the Lease"). The Lease incorporated a covenant against alienation whereby Mr Chug covenanted not to part with possession of the Property or suffer any other person to occupy the whole or part of it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from