Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2015

Can A Lease Guarantee Survive A Lease Assignment?

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

The High Court has confirmed that an unlawful assignment by an original tenant (T1) (whose obligations had been guaranteed by a surety (G)) to a new tenant (T2) could be assigned back to T1 without the guarantee being nullified.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The High Court has confirmed that an unlawful assignment by an original tenant (T1) (whose obligations had been guaranteed by a surety (G)) to a new tenant (T2) could be assigned back to T1 without the guarantee being nullified by the anti-avoidance provisions of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (the 1995 Act). This judgement1 given on 16 January 2015 turns, as is often the case, on quite a specific set of facts, but it does provide further useful guidance on what is permitted under the 1995 Act and what, by contrast, risks being declared unlawful, with the potential to devalue the landlord's interest.

The facts (two very similar cases were heard together) were as follows: T1 (whose obligations G had guaranteed) had, assigned the lease to T2 in breach of its covenants in the lease. The fact that the assignment was unlawful meant that T1 and G were not released from their obligations at the point at which the lease was assigned to T2. All parties wanted to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from