Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2026

Joint Expert Meetings: Best Practice, Common Pitfalls, And What Instructing Solicitors Expect

Stewarts Law LLP
Stewarts Law LLP
Contributor
Stewarts Law LLP

Stewarts Law LLP

As one of the UK's market-leading disputes law firms, Stewarts advises and represents corporates,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Stewarts Law LLP

Joint expert meetings are often pivotal in litigation. Their importance should not be underestimated. A focused expert discussion can narrow the issues, clarify disagreement...

United KingdomPrivacy

Joint expert meetings are often pivotal in litigation. Their importance should not be underestimated. A focused expert discussion can narrow the issues, clarify disagreement, and materially affect the parties’ assessment of risk. In this article, Alexandra Winch explains why it is essential that both solicitors and experts understand the purpose of the meeting and the importance of the joint statement in assisting the court.

Joint expert meetings can be nerve-racking for an expert. Experts are left to their own devices and required to engage directly with their opposite number without the immediate support of the legal team. A poorly prepared expert, an unclear concession or unexplained change of opinion can materially weaken, and in some cases derail, an otherwise well-prepared case.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from