Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2025

It's Nothing Personal - Reassessing Pseudonymised Data And AI After EDPS v SRB

Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
Contributor
Lewis Silkin

Lewis Silkin

Joint managing partners: Jo Farmer, Richard Miskella International offices: Dublin, Hong Kong...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lewis Silkin

As organisations accelerate efforts to deploy AI, access to large volumes of training data has become essential to maintaining a competitive edge.

United KingdomPrivacy

As organisations accelerate efforts to deploy AI, access to large volumes of training data has become essential to maintaining a competitive edge. But this raises a fundamental legal question; in the context of the GDPR, how far can businesses go when using datasets that appear de-identified or pseudonymised, particularly when training AI models?

On 4 September 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") issued its judgement in European Data Protection Supervisor ("EDPS") v Single Resolution Board ("SRB"), which introduces a potentially significant shift to how this question should be answered. It suggests that in some cases, certain pseudonymised data may fall outside the scope of the GDPR, depending on the recipient's perspective and who holds the means to re-identify the individuals concerned.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from