Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2007

Software – Cases Shed New Light On Patentability

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

Computer implemented patents potentially face exclusion from patentability by way of section 1(2) of the Patents Act 1977 as "a program for a computer…as such".

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Sam Tuxford
Sam Tuxford

Computer implemented patents potentially face exclusion from patentability by way of section 1(2) of the Patents Act 1977 as "a program for a computer…as such".

The Court of Appeal in Aerotel framed the following four-step test:

  1. Properly construe the claim;
  2. Identify what the actual contribution is (i.e. identify what the claimed invention adds over the prior art);
  3. Ask whether the actual contribution falls solely within the excluded subject matter; and
  4. Check whether the actual or alleged contribution is actually technical in nature.

T

he fact that the High Court rejected the first post-Aerotel patents considered in Cappellini and Bloomberg (Pumfrey J) and Oneida (Floyd) will not be welcome news to patentees. However, the Court has at least shed a little light on the application of the test. The two take home points being:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from