Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2017

Lessons on Libel from Katie Hopkins

Food blogger Jack Monroe has been awarded £24,000 in damages in a libel action against controversial columnist Katie Hopkins. The action stemmed from two tweets posted in May 2015 by Katie Hopkins asking Jack if she had "scrawled on any memorials recently".

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Food blogger Jack Monroe has been awarded £24,000 in damages in a libel action against controversial columnist Katie Hopkins.

The action stemmed from two tweets posted in May 2015 by Katie Hopkins asking Jack if she had "scrawled on any memorials recently". Ms Monroe pursued a libel action against Ms Hopkins contending that the tweets had caused "serious harm" to her reputation by insinuating that she had either vandalised or condoned and approved of the vandalising of war memorials.

In the judgment, Mr Justice Warby ruled in Ms Monroe's favour by contending that the tweets had caused her "real and substantial" distress and was therefore entitled to "fair and reasonable compensation".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from