Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2020

Hate Speech: Can We All Agree On A Definition?

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Following mounting pressure, including an advertising boycott of Facebook earlier this year, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have agreed to create a unified definition of harmful content...

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Following mounting pressure, including an advertising boycott of Facebook earlier this year, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have agreed to create a unified definition of harmful content across all their social media platforms.This will likely provide welcome clarity and consistency for all acceptable use and content policies across the tech industry.     

Online content sharing platforms have fostered the age old battle between the right to freedom of expression and the restriction of illegal 'hate speech'.  Social media has enhanced our ability to communicate across borders and interact immediately over politics, fashion and anything in between.  However, it has also facilitated the dissemination of hateful and often harmful speech  to a mass audience at the touch of a button.  Large tech companies have often taken the view that they are not responsible for the content their users create, they provide the infrastructure and it is up to individuals to provide the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from