Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2006

eBay Enforcement May Be A Groundless Threat

On an interim injunction application to restrain an alleged threat of infringement proceedings, the High Court held in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell that that the submission of an enforcement request through eBay’s Verified Rights Owner (VeRO) Program could constitute a groundless threat of infringement proceedings of Community Designs.

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Isabel Davies
Isabel Davies
Tom Scourfield
Tom Scourfield

On an interim injunction application to restrain an alleged threat of infringement proceedings, the High Court held in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell that that the submission of an enforcement request through eBay’s Verified Rights Owner (VeRO) Program could constitute a groundless threat of infringement proceedings of Community Designs. The Court was concerned at the ability of a rights owner to use the VeRO program to "snuff out an avenue of the claimant’s business" without the need to follow up with formal proceedings, or any proper investigation of the veracity of the claim. The decision highlights the wide-ranging application of the groundless threats provisions, and raises the possibility that enforcement through eBay’s VeRO program may leave IP owners vulnerable to threats proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from