Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2013

Commissions – The Best Kept Secret?

Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Contributor
Withers LLP

Withers LLP

Withers is an international law firm focused on the personal, business and philanthropic interests...

View firm profile
Explore more from Withers LLP

It is not uncommon in the art trade for the parties to a sale and purchase to remain anonymous and for there to be a number of agents/art dealers involved in the transaction.

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

It is not uncommon in the art trade for the parties to a sale and purchase to remain anonymous and for there to be a number of agents/art dealers involved in the transaction. Of course, the agents/art dealers expect to receive a commission for their efforts. However, as recent cases show, problems can arise when there is a lack of transparency between the various parties and secret commissions are paid or received.

In the case of Spencer-Churchill v. Faggionato1, the seller, Lord Edward, instructed Mr Faggionato, an art dealer, to market his painting. Lord Edward specifically told Mr Faggionato that he did not wish to sell the painting to a dealer and, in particular, to a family of New York dealers known as the Mugrabis. In due course, Mr Faggionato informed Lord Edward that he had received an offer for the painting for US$6 million from a Floridian collector, whose identity was not revealed. Lord Edward was uncertain about accepting the offer and asked Mr Faggionato

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from