Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2018

Duty Bound: What Should A Solicitor Do When Confronted By A Mistake By The Other Side?

Travers Smith LLP
Travers Smith LLP
Contributor
Travers Smith LLP

Travers Smith LLP

It is not just law at Travers Smith. We treat our clients’ business as our business, their dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Travers Smith LLP

In the first case, Barton v Wright Hassall LLP, a claimant litigant in person purported to serve the defendant's solicitors by email on the last day of the validity period ...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Two Recent High Profile Cases Throw A Spotlight On This Question.

TWO RECENT HIGH PROFILE CASES THROW A SPOTLIGHT ON THIS QUESTION.

In the first case, Barton v Wright Hassall LLP, a claimant litigant in person purported to serve the defendant's solicitors by email on the last day of the validity period for the claim form, in circumstances where the defendant's solicitors had not indicated that they were prepared to accept service by that method. The defendant subsequently took the point that the purported service was bad, that the claim had not been validly served in time, and that it was statute barred.

The claimant then brought an application for retrospective validation of his bad service pursuant to CPR 6.15(2), on the basis that there was a "good reason" to do so. One of the "good reasons" for validation was said to be that the defendant's solicitors had been "playing technical games" by not warning him, when they received his email purporting to effect

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from