Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2026

Cryptoassets, Conversion And The Limits Of Available Remedies

Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
Contributor
Lewis Silkin

Lewis Silkin

Joint managing partners: Jo Farmer, Richard Miskella International offices: Dublin, Hong Kong...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lewis Silkin

The High Court's decision in Ping Fai Yuen v Fun Yung Li & Anor examines whether traditional tort law, specifically conversion and trespass to goods, can apply to cryptoassets like Bitcoin.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In this article, Leo Meredith, Ivana Mensah and Nicola Thompson of Lewis Silkin examine the important decision in Ping Fai Yuen v Fun Yung Li & Anor [2026] EWHC 532 (KB), which clarifies the limited application of traditional tort law to cryptoassets.

This article first appeared on the Practical Law Dispute Resolution column on 18 May 2026. Reproduced from Practical Law with the permission of the publishers. For further information visit www.practicallaw.com.

The High Court's decision in Ping Fai Yuen v Fun Yung Li & Anor [2026] EWHC 532 (KB) provides important clarification on the interaction between traditional tort law and emerging digital assets. Whilst cryptoassets such as Bitcoin can constitute property under English law, the decision laid bare the limits of tortious causes of action, in particular the tort of conversion, with regard to such assets.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from