Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2017

Committal Proceedings - Goldtrail Travel v Onur Air

The claimants applied for permission to bring committal proceedings against the defendants and their solicitors.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2017] UKSC 57



The claimants applied for permission to bring committal proceedings against the defendants and their solicitors. Those defendants had previously obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order ("NPO") which was then replaced by a consent order. The consent order did not specify the use which could be made of documents disclosed pursuant to the order. After receiving the documents, the defendants' solicitors wrote to a former employee of the claimants warning that if certain steps were not taken by him, proceedings would be commenced against him.

The claimants allege that that was a breach of CPR r31.22 because the defendants and their solicitors were using the disclosed documents for a collateral purpose.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from