Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2022

Case Note: Tindall v Thames Valley Police [2022] EWCA Civ 25

The case of Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police ought to be read by all personal injury practitioners.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The case of Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police ought to be read by all personal injury practitioners. The Court of Appeal's judgment summarises the circumstances in which a public authority owes a duty of care to protect individuals. This article deals with the facts of the case, the approaches taken by the Master and Court of Appeal, and finally provides concluding thoughts on the impact of this judgment in future claims against public authorities.

The Facts

On a cold spring morning in 2014, a motorist, 'Mr. K,' was driving along the A413 in Buckinghamshire. He skidded on black ice, and lost control of his vehicle. Despite being injured, he called the emergency services, advising them of the danger posed by the black ice. The call was taken by a police control room operator. During this period, Mr. K sought to alert other road users of the danger.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from