Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2025

A False Start - Expert Determination In The Olympic Stadium

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

The recent decision in WH Holding Limited v E20 Stadium LLP provides helpful guidance on the meaning of "manifest error" in the context of an expert determination clause.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent decision in WH Holding Limited v E20 Stadium LLP provides helpful guidance on the meaning of "manifest error" in the context of an expert determination clause.

Successful challenges to expert determinations are unusual, so the Court's comments in this case are a useful insight into the likely future treatment of such claims. In particular, parties considering expert determination as a dispute resolution mechanism should be aware of the very limited scope for challenging an expert's decision.

What happened?

E20 Stadium LLP (E20), WH Holding Limited (WHH) and West Ham United FC entered into a concession agreement whereby WHH was permitted to run sporting events at the stadium in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and West Ham United FC could use the stadium as their home ground.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from