Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JUNE 2008

Exit Strategies

Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP
Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP
Contributor
Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP

Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP

Peters & Peters was one of the first City law firms to develop a key multidisciplinary approach,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP

It can seem difficult to spot general trends in extradition case law and the decision of the House of Lords in partially refusing the extradition request from the US for Mr Norris may provide a useful excuse to attempt this analysis.

United KingdomInternational Law
Anand Doobay
Anand Doobay

A shorter version of this article was published in The Lawyer on 17 June 2008

It can seem difficult to spot general trends in extradition case law and the decision of the House of Lords in partially refusing the extradition request from the US for Mr Norris may provide a useful excuse to attempt this analysis. Mr Norris's extradition was sought for his part in the price fixing engaged in by his former employer Morgan Crucible and his alleged actions in seeking to obstruct a US criminal investigation into this.

Most first instance extradition decisions, which are all reached by designated District Judges sitting at the City of Westminster Magistrates' Court, are unreported and only the most sensational receive any publicity. Appeals are heard by the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court and whilst these decisions are now sometimes more easily available on the Internet, they do not receive as wide

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from