Yesterday, I virtually attended a half-day conference organised
by the UCL Institute of Brand and Innovation Law (IBIL), looking at
IP and spin-out policies of universities and how this is
evolving.
The conference was enlightening and informative, and I will
highlight a few points I found of particular interest. As someone
who advises many UK universities on securing IP, I was not at all
surprised to hear that, while one would expect the ultimate goal to
be similar across the universities, there is still a significant
degree of divergence in terms of how this may be delivered. This
was nicely illustrated by looking at the total number of terms
universities use to define IP, as well as the length of their
published IP policies. With respect to the number of terms defining
IP, this varied from zero to 22 and the length of university IP
polices varied from 3 pages to 71 pages. Although the data was
anonymized, it would be interesting to analyse which universities
fell