Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2015

Rihanna Publicity Case Shows Differences In UK Law

A very recent English Court of Appeal decision shows the distinct approach of English courts to publicity rights (Fenty v. Topshop [2015] EWCA Civ 3).

United KingdomIntellectual Property

A very recent English Court of Appeal decision shows the distinct approach of English courts to publicity rights (Fenty v. Topshop [2015] EWCA Civ 3).

In 2012, the fashion retailer Topshop began selling in its UK stores and through its website a fashion t-shirt showing a clearly recognizable image of Rihanna, the well known pop singer. The owner of copyright licensed the image to Topshop, but Topshop did not license rights from Rihanna. The image is below:

The Court of Appeal noted that Topshop had previously sold garments bearing images of famous persons, some of which had been authorised and some of which had not.

Topshop sold about 12,000 units of the Rihanna t-shirt between March and August 2012, at a price of £22. Initially the shirt was described online as the "Rihanna tank" and "photographic Rihanna motif tank", but by mid-March of 2012 those references to Rihanna had been removed, possibly because Rihanna is a registered trade-mark for clothing.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from