Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2023

Marks & Clerk Contributes To The Latest AI Deep Dive From The Drum

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

As brands rush in to capitalise on image-generating AI models like Dall-E 2 and Midjourney, a growing number of critics have been speaking out against...

United KingdomIntellectual Property

As brands rush in to capitalise on image-generating AI models like Dall-E 2 and Midjourney, a growing number of critics have been speaking out against the tendency of these models to plagiarise the work of (human) artists. In the latest, excellent Deep Dive from The Drum, the publication explores this issue - including some potential solutions, featuring insights from partner, patent attorney and expert in computer-implemented inventions and internet-related technologies: Matthijs Branderhorst.

Additionally, as the lawsuit mentioned above should make clear, generative AI raises some legal – in addition to ethical – concerns. Any marketer who is considering integrating generative AI in a campaign would be well-advised to pay close attention to the laws that are likely to grow and evolve around this new technology – including, perhaps, laws intended to protect artists' intellectual property.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from