Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MAY 2007

Da Vinci Code Appeal Dismissed

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

This expected decision that Dan Brown had not plagiarised continues the recent line of unsuccessful copyright infringement cases over the expression of general ideas.

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Sara Payne
Sara Payne

This expected decision that Dan Brown had not plagiarised continues the recent line of unsuccessful copyright infringement cases over the expression of general ideas.

28 March 2007 saw the Court of Appeal confirm that Dan Brown’s code and conspiracy thriller ‘The Da Vinci Code’ did not infringe copyright in a book that was used as research for his novel. The claim had been brought by two of the authors of ‘The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail’, a 1982 work described by them as historical conjecture on the idea that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had a child together and that their bloodline continues today.

Da Vinci was the latest in a spate of recent cases addressing the thorny issue of non-classic copyright infringement. This is not the traditional copying of for example, written language, code or graphics but the more nebulous idea of taking of a theme, format or structure, often described as the "look and feel" of the copyright work. Whilst copyright does not protect an idea, it can

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from