Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JUNE 2022

An Interesting Viewpoint On Support At The EPO

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

I recently came across an interesting blog post (link below) while browsing my Linkedin feed. The author, Martin Wilming, puts forward some interesting points regarding the requirement in Europe to bring the description into line with the claims.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

I recently came across an interesting blog post (link below) while browsing my Linkedin feed. The author, Martin Wilming, puts forward some interesting points regarding the requirement in Europe to bring the description into line with the claims.

European patent attorneys will be all too familiar with the EPO's recent strict application of Art 84 EPC as it relates to amending the description such that the claims are "supported by the description". In the past, once an allowable claim set had been arrived at, it was often possible to simply amend the description to replace the phrase "in an embodiment there is provided" with "disclosed herein is", when describing examples not covered by the claims. However, the EPO's current approach is to request that such examples be deleted from the description or marked as not forming part of the claimed invention. That is, under the current approach it is not enough that the subject matter of the claims appear in the description,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from