Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2026

A Reminder To Get Claims Right For Computer-Implemented Methods Of Modelling

Boult Wade Tennant LLP
Boult Wade Tennant LLP
Contributor
Boult Wade Tennant LLP

Boult Wade Tennant LLP

Boult is a top-tier European firm specializing in IP advice and solutions for both domestic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Boult Wade Tennant LLP

A recent case from the EPO’s Boards of Appeal (T 0847/14) provides a useful reminder of the importance of preparing an appropriate claim set for computer modelling inventions.

United KingdomIntellectual Property
  • A recent case from the EPO’s Boards of Appeal (T 0847/14) provides a useful reminder of the importance of preparing an appropriate claim set for computer modelling inventions.
  • G 1/19 indicated that a computer-implemented method claim that merely produces data is unlikely to provide the technical character required to support an inventive step.
    • Technical character most often follows from including a real-world application in the claim.
  • The recent case also demonstrated why it is important that appropriate claims are present when the patent grants.
    • A post-grant amendment was found to be an unallowable as it broadened the scope of protection, even though the amendment added a further step.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from