Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2018

3D Printing And Medtech: The IP Challenge

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

At present, 3D printing – or additive manufacturing – struggles to compete with traditional methods of mass production on price.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

At present, 3D printing – or additive manufacturing – struggles to compete with traditional methods of mass production on price. However, in industries such as medtech – where products are far more likely to be bespoke to an individual patient – additive manufacturing is far more applicable, putting medtech at the forefront of what many believe will be the next step-change in manufacturing. The US FDA's recent approval of Spritam, a 3D printed epilepsy drug from Aprecia Pharmaceuticals, is likely to be just the first of many 3D printed medical products to come to market as 3D printing technology gets ever more sophisticated.

The intellectual property implications

Securing intellectual property (IP) on pioneering inventions can be challenging, requiring technological foresight in an area that is likely to change in character over the medium or even short term (and certainly over the 20-year term of a patent). There is also the possibility that new business models

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from