Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JANUARY 1999

The New British Library Case - The Difference between Insuring and Ensuring

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

United KingdomInsurance
The New British Library Case - The Difference between Insuring and Ensuring

By
Patrick Holmes

As construction projects go, few can have greater notoriety than the new British Library at St. Pancras. We shall probably never know who are the real villains in this sorry tale - it is likely that there were many. However, from the privileged position of knowing virtually nothing about the project at first hand, I should like to nominate the project insurers as candidates for the hall of shame.

I have nothing against insurers generally. As their involvement in the industry grows, I would make few friends by saying that I have. Rather, my complaint arises having read the judgement of the Official Referees Court in the so-called British Library case.[1]

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from