Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 OCTOBER 2012

Professional Indemnity Bulletin

In July KPMG was successful in its application for summary dismissal of a claim worth more than USD$52 million.

United KingdomInsurance
Tom Bedford
Tom Bedford
Zoe Perry
Zoe Perry

Arrowhead Capital Finance Ltd (In Liquidation) v KPMG LLP

In July KPMG was successful in its application for summary dismissal of a claim worth more than USD$52 million.

Background

KPMG had been instructed by Dragon Futures Limited ("Dragon") to advise on creating/implementing due diligence procedures to enable Dragon to make VAT input tax claims on the sale and purchase of mobile telephones. In January 2004 the claimant, Arrowhead, agreed to make loans to Dragon on the strength of Arrowhead's business model which required these VAT input claims to be successful.

It transpired that the VAT input tax claims were connected to fraud, something Dragon should have been aware of, and accordingly HMRC rejected its claims for input tax. Dragon subsequently defaulted on the loan repayments, leaving a balance of some $52 million due to Arrowhead.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from