Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2018

Northern Ireland: Hire Claim Does Not Pass MOT Test

The High Court in Northern Ireland has ruled that the failure to MOT a vehicle is sufficient to provide a defendant with an illegality defence to a hire claim.

United KingdomInsurance

James Morgan v Bryson Recycling Limited [2018] NIQB 12



The High Court in Northern Ireland has ruled that the failure to MOT a vehicle is sufficient to provide a defendant with an illegality defence to a hire claim. The decision contrasts with previous judgments in other UK jurisdictions regarding the applicability of the ex turpi causa defence to those criminal offences which might ordinarily be considered minor.

Background

The Claimant's vehicle had been parked outside his home, when a vehicle driven by a representative of the Defendant collided with it.

A claim was submitted for the pre-action value of the car, storage and hire costs for a replacement vehicle. The Defendant accepted liability, agreed settlement of the PAV claim but disputed the hire claim. The Claimant's vehicle was found not have had a valid MOT for 4 months prior to the collision.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from