Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JUNE 2012

EAR v Project Cargo Policy - The Timing Of Damage

The Claimants in this case were insurers under an Erection All Risks (EAR) policy, issued in connection with a project for the installation of economiser blocks to a UK waste recycling plant.

United KingdomInsurance
Anthony Menzies
Anthony Menzies
James Crabtree
James Crabtree

European Group Ltd & Ors v Chartis Insurance UK Ltd [2012]1Commercial Court, 11 May 2012

The Claimants in this case were insurers under an Erection All Risks (EAR) policy, issued in connection with a project for the installation of economiser blocks to a UK waste recycling plant. The Defendants were the marine project cargo insurers in relation to the same equipment, which had been produced by a manufacturer in Romania and was required to be brought to the site by road to Constanta and from there by ship to Southampton.

Both policies also covered delay in start up caused by damage to the property covered by the respective policy. Each policy also incorporated a "50/50 clause", providing that, in the event it was not possible to ascertain whether the damage occurred before or after the arrival of the equipment at the facility, the two policies would each contribute 50% to the adjusted claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from