Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2019

W.I.R.E Debates: Law Commission Proposals On Suspicious Activity Reporting

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

The primary aim of the Law Commission's report was to address systemic problems in the SAR process to ensure that it is proportionate and efficient.

United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector

An earlier version of this article was published by Thomson Reuters on 8 July 2019. 

The UK Law Commission has published a report1 criticising existing anti-money laundering legislation and providing recommendations to improve the quality of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).  What should we make of these recommendations, and do they go far enough?  Fred Saugman and Lloyd Firth present their views.

The background

The SAR regime is designed to be one of the UK's chief AML tools, providing intelligence about suspected money laundering to law enforcement agencies and shielding the reporting entities from criminal liability. It operates by way of required disclosures (those operating in the regulated sector are obliged to raise suspicions about potential money laundering, with a failure to do so a criminal offence) and authorised disclosures (individuals who suspect they are dealing with the proceeds of crime can seek consent to complete a transaction by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from