An earlier version of this article was published
by Thomson Reuters on 8 July 2019.
The UK Law Commission has published a report1
criticising existing anti-money laundering legislation and
providing recommendations to improve the quality of Suspicious
Activity Reports (SARs). What should we make of
these recommendations, and do they go far
enough? Fred Saugman and
Lloyd Firth present their views.
The background
The SAR regime is designed to be one of the UK's chief AML
tools, providing intelligence about suspected money laundering to
law enforcement agencies and shielding the reporting entities from
criminal liability. It operates by way of required disclosures
(those operating in the regulated sector are obliged to raise
suspicions about potential money laundering, with a failure to do
so a criminal offence) and authorised disclosures (individuals who
suspect they are dealing with the proceeds of crime can seek
consent to complete a transaction by