Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2019

UK Government Issues Report On Huawei Vulnerabilities

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Contributor
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden has become a go-to firm in the German legal market since opening our doors in Frankfurt in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

On March 28, 2019, the Oversight Board of the United Kingdom's Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC)1 released a report identifying "serious and systematic defects in Huawei's software engineering and cyber security competence."

United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
Michael E. Leiter
Michael E. Leiter
Donald L. Vieira
Donald L. Vieira
Joe Molosky
Joe Molosky
Jennifer Ho
Jennifer Ho
Nathan Mitchell
Nathan Mitchell

Introduction

On March 28, 2019, the Oversight Board of the United Kingdom's Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC)1 released a report identifying "serious and systematic defects in Huawei's software engineering and cyber security competence." This report — the fifth annual review of Huawei products used in British telecommunications networks — represents the most detailed public expression of concern regarding security vulnerabilities in Huawei products by a national government to date, and bolsters, with significant technical detail, the concerns that U.S. government officials have raised about Huawei. Although the report states that the issues are not believed to be the result of Chinese state interference, the issues identified in the report are nonetheless serious enough that the Oversight Board found that it could offer only "limited assurance" that long-term security risks can be managed in the Huawei equipment currently employed in U.K. networks. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

Budget Tracker (2026)

The Chancellor of the Exchequer faces the formidable challenge of delivering his first Budget amid economic headwinds, geopolitical instability, and a wave of ambitious government promises. With GDP growth forecast at just 1.1%, inflation at 3.4%, and public sector net borrowing exceeding £115 billion, can he balance fiscal responsibility with pledges to avoid raising Income Tax, National Insurance, or VAT while funding increased defence spending and social care reforms?
United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
Travers Smith LLP
Travers Smith LLP
Article

Sanctions: Fortnightly Summary

The UK government has significantly expanded its sanctions framework targeting Russia, introducing measures against individuals and entities involved in military supply chains, energy sectors, cryptocurrency networks, and alleged human rights violations. These developments reflect an evolving enforcement landscape with new powers, increased scrutiny of sanctions evasion, and landmark legal clarifications affecting businesses operating in sanctioned jurisdictions.
European UnionGovernment, Public Sector
BCL Solicitors LLP
BCL Solicitors LLP
Article

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) And National Security Screening

Angela Gregson of Weightmans and Sean Ryan of Whitney Moore compare Ireland's new foreign direct investment screening regime with the UK's established National Security and Investment Act, examining when notification is required, key procedural differences, and practical steps to navigate both frameworks. The analysis draws on recent annual reports to reveal how these regimes are operating in practice and what reforms are on the horizon.
United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
Weightmans LLP
Weightmans LLP
Article

Peptides In Aesthetics And Wellness: The Regulatory And Criminal Risks Practitioners Need To Know

The aesthetics and wellness markets are seeing explosive growth in peptide treatments, but many practitioners may not fully understand the complex regulatory framework governing these products. What begins as offering an innovative treatment could escalate into criminal investigations, frozen bank accounts, and asset forfeiture proceedings under proceeds of crime legislation.
United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
JMW Solicitors LLP
JMW Solicitors LLP
Article

New York City’s Click-to-Cancel Rule: What Businesses Need To Know

New York City has enacted the nation's first municipal click-to-cancel rule, requiring businesses to provide clear disclosures, simple cancellation processes, and advance renewal notices for subscription services. With approximately 30 states already implementing similar regulations and the federal landscape in flux following the FTC's vacated rule, companies now face an increasingly complex patchwork of compliance obligations. The rule takes effect October 1, 2026, and imposes penalties ranging from $525 t
United StatesConsumer Protection
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

US Government Announces New Iran Sanctions Measures

The U.S. government has dramatically expanded Iran-related sanctions through new sectoral determinations, entity designations, and the suspension of key authorizations, while simultaneously targeting third-country financial institutions that facilitate Iranian transactions. These measures significantly broaden secondary sanctions risks across aviation, digital assets, gold, shipping, and technology sectors, marking a comprehensive escalation in economic pressure against Iran and its international networks.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

Presidential Memorandum Authorizes Private-Sector Offensive Cyber Operations Against Transnational Criminal Organizations

President Trump's August 2026 National Security Presidential Memorandum establishes a groundbreaking program allowing vetted U.S. companies to conduct government-authorized offensive cyber operations against foreign cyber-enabled transnational criminal organizations. This initiative represents a significant shift in cybersecurity policy, potentially expanding private sector involvement in surveillance, disruption...
GlobalTechnology
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

OCC And FDIC Finalize Standards For Unsafe Or Unsound Practices And MRAs

The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC have issued a joint final rule redefining "unsafe or unsound practice" and establishing new standards for matters requiring attention (MRAs) in bank supervision. How will these changes, which prioritize material financial risk over procedural deficiencies, reshape the regulatory landscape for financial institutions when they take effect in November 2026?
United StatesFinance and Banking
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Podcast

Analyzing NRSC v. FEC: What The Supreme Court’s Ruling Means For Parties, PACs And Donors (Podcast)

The Supreme Court's decision in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC has fundamentally altered the landscape of political party spending by eliminating federal limits on coordinated expenditures between parties and candidates. This ruling preserves existing campaign finance guardrails while potentially reshaping the power dynamics of party committees, joint fundraising operations, and various political action committees.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

The SEC’s ‘Hands-Off’ Policy Alters The Calculus For Excluding Shareholder Proposals

The SEC staff's decision to stop reviewing shareholder proposal exclusions has fundamentally altered the risk calculus for companies. While this hands-off approach initially appeared to give companies more freedom, it has introduced new challenges including heightened litigation risk, potential bylaw-based proxy contests, and reputational concerns that boards must carefully weigh when deciding whether to exclude proposals from their proxy statements.
United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP