Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2014

LIBOR Manipulation Claims

DMH Stallard LLP
DMH Stallard LLP
Contributor
DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard delivers successful outcomes for businesses and individuals by providing tailored...

View firm profile
Explore more from DMH Stallard LLP

In November 2013, the Court of Appeal delivered its long-awaited judgment in the cases of Graiseley Properties Ltd and others v Barclays Bank Plc and Deutsche Bank and others v Unitech Global Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 1372.

United KingdomFinance and Banking

In November 2013, the Court of Appeal delivered its long-awaited judgment in the cases of Graiseley Properties Ltd and others v Barclays Bank Plc and Deutsche Bank and others v Unitech Global Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 1372. The appeals, which were heard together, form part of ongoing proceedings in what are seen as test cases for claims relating to LIBOR.

  • The claimants were allowed to amend their original statements of case to include claims for fraudulent misrepresentation on the basis of a number of implied representations relating to the accuracy of each bank's LIBOR submissions.
  • The claims relate to interest-rate swap mis-selling. The claimants assert that the Bank mis-sold interest rate swaps, containing rates referenced to LIBOR, on the basis that they were suitable products when they were not.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from