Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2024

Modifications Of Contracts – The James Waste Case

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

On 19 May 2023 sitting in the Technology and Construction Court, within the High Court of England and Wales, J Waksman handed down his judgement in James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council.

United KingdomEnvironment

The judgment in James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council provides insights into contract modifications and how these may be considered against Regulation 72.

Introduction

On 19 May 2023 sitting in the Technology and Construction Court, within the High Court of England and Wales, J Waksman handed down his judgement in James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council.

The decision in question concerned whether a local authority had lawfully modified its contract with a waste management company under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCRs).

In terms of the facts, the Council had awarded a contract to Veolia, with an option to extend its term (the "Veolia Contract"). At the time this contract was entered into, it was envisaged that a mechanical biological treatment facility would be built and commissioned in the local area, but unfortunately that project ultimately did not proceed, which meant that the Council had to put alternative arrangements

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from