Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2009

Environmental Torts And Pure Economic Loss

An environmental civil action has been struck out recently. The claimants had suffered loss but were unable to demonstrate any form of tangible physical damage.

United KingdomEnvironment
Aidan Thomson
Aidan Thomson

An environmental civil action has been struck out recently. The claimants had suffered loss but were unable to demonstrate any form of tangible physical damage.

The case of D Pride & Partners & Others v Institute for Animal Health & Others arose out of an outbreak of foot and mouth disease in 2007. It was first identified at a farm in Surrey which was three miles away from a research facility operated by The Institute for Animal Health ("IAH") and Merial Animal Health Limited ("MAH").

Following the outbreak, animals were culled, a restricted zone across the whole of England was declared, and a ban on animal exports into the European Union was imposed.

Fourteen livestock farmers brought claims against IAH and MAH, together with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs as licensor and regulator of the research facility. Liability in tort (negligence, nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher) was alleged following the release of the virus

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from