Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2022

When Can A Termination Discussion Be Without Prejudice?

Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
Contributor
Lewis Silkin

Lewis Silkin

Joint managing partners: Jo Farmer, Richard Miskella International offices: Dublin, Hong Kong...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lewis Silkin

For a discussion to be "without prejudice" there must be an existing dispute between the parties. A recent EAT case helpfully clarified when a grievance will count as a dispute for these purposes.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

For a discussion to be "without prejudice" there must be an existing dispute between the parties. A recent EAT case helpfully clarified when a grievance will count as a dispute for these purposes.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has provided some helpful clarity over when a "dispute" exists between an employer and employee, allowing the employer to put forward settlement terms on a confidential without prejudice (off the record) basis. Importantly, the EAT has confirmed that the Mezzotero case does not mean that a grievance is never enough to create a dispute, that proposing termination is permissible even if the employee wants to keep their job, and that the protection of the without prejudice rule is only lost in the clearest of cases of unambiguous impropriety.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from