Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2014

TUPE Update - July 2014

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

The EAT’s decision in Jackson Lloyds Limited v Smith is a reminder that even where an acquisition is structured as a share transfer, there may be a TUPE transfer.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

TUPE AND SHARE ACQUISITIONS - A REMINDER OF THE RISKS

The EAT's decision in Jackson Lloyds Limited v Smith is a reminder that even where an acquisition is structured as a share transfer there may also be a TUPE transfer. This, and an earlier case, illustrate that if a process of integration takes place too quickly resulting in the business being purchased being no longer controlled by the purchased entity there will be a risk of there being a TUPE transfer.

SERVICE PROVISION CHANGE TRANSFERS - RELEVANCE OF CONTRACTUAL TERMS

Two recent cases looked at the relevance of contractual documentation in determining whether there has been a SPC transfer. The cases providing opposing views on the importance of the contract terms when identifying the activities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from