Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2008

Money Purchase

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

The difference between money purchase and defined benefit pensions is apparently well understood. So it may be hard to believe that there is sufficient legal uncertainty in the area for there to be any caselaw.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Edward Banister
Edward Banister
Jane Wolstenholme
Jane Wolstenholme

The difference between money purchase and defined benefit pensions is apparently well understood. So it may be hard to believe that there is sufficient legal uncertainty in the area for there to be any caselaw. In fact nothing could be further from the truth.

A recent case, Bridge Trustees v Yates & Others, has set the cat amongst the pigeons on this very subject. As a result, some members who thought they had safe money purchase benefits will see their benefits reduced as the scheme winds up in deficit. Whether certain benefits were money purchase or not was crucial because it affected whether those benefits were part of the statutory winding up priority order and where they came in that order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from