Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2018

Leniency Will Be Given To Unrepresented Claimants

The Respondent agreed with the Claimant that her employment had ended on 15 October 2016 but defended the claim.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Employment claims will not necessarily fail as a result of the Claimant failing to identify their case correctly

The Employment Appeal Tribunal ('the EAT') has recently overturned an Employment Tribunal's ('ET') decision after it had agreed with the Respondent's submission that the Claimant, who was unrepresented, had not correctly pleaded her case as one of constructive dismissal.

In the case of Aynge v Trickett, the Claimant, Miss Aynge, was employed at a restaurant which had previously been owned by her parents but was taken over by the Respondent, Mr Trickett, on 1 September 2016.

On 15 October 2016, the Claimant attended work and, following an altercation with the Respondent, she alleged she was told by him that 'this is your last shift tonight' and 'that's it, we're done'. The Claimant attended the restaurant the next day to collect her wages and enquire whether her employment had actually been terminated. On this occasion, the Respondent said to her: 'We

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from