Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2011

Employment Briefing June 2011

Identity of potential transferee not necessary for TUPE The EAT in Spaceright Europe Ltd v Ballavoine and another has followed the EAT’s decision in Harrison Bowden v Bowden in deciding that it was not necessary to identify a particular transferee in order to find that an employee had been automatically unfairly dismissed in the context of a TUPE transfer.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Identity of potential transferee not necessary for TUPE The EAT in Spaceright Europe Ltd v Ballavoine and another has followed the EAT's decision in Harrison Bowden v Bowden in deciding that it was not necessary to identify a particular transferee in order to find that an employee had been automatically unfairly dismissed in the context of a TUPE transfer. It declined to follow the opposing EAT decision in Ibex Trading Co Ltd (in administration) v Walton and others which found that it was necessary that there should be an actual transferee in mind at the time of dismissal.

Mr Ballavoine was chief executive of Ultralon Holdings Limited which was placed into administration on 23 May 2008. Mr Ballavoine was dismissed the same day. On 25 June the business and assets of Ultralon were sold as a going concern to Spaceright. This sale constituted a 'relevant transfer' under TUPE. The EAT upheld the tribunal's decision that Mr Ballavoine had been unfairly dismissed and that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from