Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2010

Employment Briefing - June 2010

In Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police the Court of Appeal considered whether an employee in his 60s was discriminated against when his employer introduced a requirement that the possession of a degree was a requirement for career progression and pay increments.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Originally published in June 2010

Age Discrimination – Requirement for a Degree

In Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police the Court of Appeal considered whether an employee in his 60s was discriminated against when his employer introduced a requirement that the possession of a degree was a requirement for career progression and pay increments.

Mr Homer was a long serving legal adviser for the Police National Legal Database (PNLD) and had previously worked as a police officer for 30 years. When Mr Homer was appointed as legal adviser the requirements for the post were that the post holder should hold a law degree or equivalent qualification or have exceptional experience/ skills in criminal law. Mr Homer qualified by virtue of the latter requirement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from