Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2007

Dismissal Issues - A Summary Of Some Important Decisions

The ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures is taken into account by tribunals and is used by them as a guide to good industrial practice.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Robert Hill
Robert Hill
Nick Dent
Nick Dent

Expired disciplinary warnings

The ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures is taken into account by tribunals and is used by them as a guide to good industrial practice.

The ACAS Code recommends that:

  • first written warnings should be active for six months;
  • final written warnings should be active for twelve months; and
  • only in the case of extremely serious conduct, which is bordering on gross misconduct, should warnings remain active indefinitely.

In Airbus UK Limited v Webb (2006), Mr Webb was employed as an aircraft fitter. In July 2004, he was initially summarily dismissed for gross misconduct because he had allegedly fraudulently misused company time and equipment by washing his car when he should have been working. However, on appeal, a final written warning was imposed, which was expressed to remain on his personnel file for 12 months. When he was reinstated, he was sent a letter informing him that further misconduct was likely to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from