Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MAY 2023

Case Update – Enforceability Of Non-Compete Clauses

Herrington Carmichael LLP
Herrington Carmichael LLP
Contributor
Herrington Carmichael LLP

Herrington Carmichael LLP

The origins of the practice can be traced back over 180 years in Wokingham and 150 in Aldershot. It...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herrington Carmichael LLP

Non-compete provisions which restrict a former employer for working for a competitor is not uncommon but for it to be considered enforceable it is essential that the restriction...

United KingdomEmployment and HR

The General Principle

Non-compete provisions which restrict a former employer for working for a competitor is not uncommon but for it to be considered enforceable it is essential that the restriction does not go any further than necessary to protect a legitimate business interest and is not an unfair restraint of trade. It is also important that the clause is properly drafted and is clear.

Boydell v NZP Ltd

In the recent case of Boydell V NZP, the Court of Appeal considered a decision made by the High Court to delete wording from a non-compete clause in order to make it enforceable.

Dr Boydell was a senior employee of NZP and was employed as Head of Commercial – Specialty Products. The non-compete clause restricted Dr Boydell from being involved in any activities that would compete with the business of NZP (or any group companies) for a period of 12 months from the termination of his employment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from