Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2019

Sexual Offence Suspects Deserve Anonymity

BCL Solicitors LLP
BCL Solicitors LLP
Contributor
BCL Solicitors LLP

BCL Solicitors LLP

BCL Solicitors is a market leading firm specialising in domestic and international corporate and...

View firm profile
Explore more from BCL Solicitors LLP

Suspects are blighted by years under investigation. Their names should be kept secret until they are charged

United KingdomCriminal Law

Suspects are blighted by years under investigation. Their names should be kept secret until they are charged

Early publication of a suspect's name in an investigation into a sexual offence can have devastating consequences.

While the guarantee of lifelong anonymity for complainants, regardless of the outcome of any police investigation, is enshrined in law, no equivalent protection exists for suspects. A string of recent high-profile investigations – and the announcement earlier this week that Sir Cliff Richard has backed the organisation Falsely Accused Individuals for Reform – highlight the need for action.

The concept of extending anonymity to protect the identity of those suspected of sexual offences is not new. The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976 enshrined it, only to be repealed in 1988.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from