Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2025

Fraud's New Frontline: Why Civil Litigators Are Thinking Criminal

Devonshires Solicitors LLP
Devonshires Solicitors LLP
Contributor
Devonshires Solicitors LLP

Devonshires Solicitors LLP

Recognised as industry leaders, with roots that date back to 1841, we have a deep understanding of...

View firm profile
Explore more from Devonshires Solicitors LLP

The traditional divide between civil and criminal enforcement is blurring, particularly in complex fraud cases. With public agencies overwhelmed and sophisticated fraud on the rise...

United KingdomCriminal Law

The traditional divide between civil and criminal enforcement is blurring, particularly in complex fraud cases. With public agencies overwhelmed and sophisticated fraud on the rise, commercial litigators are increasingly turning to criminal law tools to secure redress, recover assets, and apply pressure.

The growth of private prosecutions, the strategic use of freezing orders, and the overlapping reach of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ("POCA") are creating a hybrid approach to litigation that many commercial clients can no longer afford to ignore.

Decline of Public Enforcement and the Rise of the Private Prosecution

The growing use of private prosecutions does not represent a shift in legal principle, but rather a practical response to systemic delays and constraints in the criminal justice system.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from