Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2017

A Judicial Take On SFO Investigative Powers

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The High Court of Justice of England and Wales ("The High Court") recently provided a rare insight into the difficulties that companies and individuals may face when challenging the basis of a SFO...

United KingdomCriminal Law

The High Court of Justice of England and Wales ("The High Court") recently provided a rare insight into the difficulties that companies and individuals may face when challenging the basis of a Serious Fraud Office ("SFO") investigation.  Unaoil Group ("Unaoil"), a Monaco based company providing industrial solutions to the energy sector in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa, challenged the basis on which the SFO conducted its investigation against the company.  The High Court rejected the judicial review claim brought by Unaoil.1  This is the second judicial review decision that the SFO has won in twelve months and demonstrates the increasing confidence of the prosecuting authorities following the £497.25m Rolls Royce deferred prosecution agreement (DPA). On 28 April 2017, the SFO announced an investigation into the activities of UK subsidiaries of the US engineering company KBR Inc. which related to its ongoing investigation of Unaoil. This may indicate that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from