Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2026

When A Term Sheet Becomes Binding: What Can We Learn From Hoffman v Finalto?

Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
Contributor
Lewis Silkin

Lewis Silkin

Joint managing partners: Jo Farmer, Richard Miskella International offices: Dublin, Hong Kong...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lewis Silkin

A recent Commercial Court decision is a stark reminder that a "term sheet" can and often will be binding. In Hoffman & Anor v Finalto Group Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 921 (Comm), the court found that a preliminary equity...

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

A recent Commercial Court decision is a stark reminder that a "term sheet" can and often will be binding. In Hoffman & Anor v Finalto Group Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 921 (Comm), the court found that a preliminary equity term sheet entered into in connection with an M&A transaction created legally binding obligations even though the intended long-form documentation to formalise the equity arrangements never followed. In addition, the court determined that walking away from the follow-on documents could amount to repudiatory breach.

The takeaway message is simple: draft your preliminary transaction documents with precision.

The deal in plain English

The dispute arose from Gopher Investments' acquisition of Finalto, a financial services technology business. Before the acquisition, Mr Hoffman was Finalto's CEO and Mr Greenbaum was its COO.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from