Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2017

The Saga Decision: Concurrent Delay And Causation

The English High Court decision in Saga Cruises BDF Ltd & Anor v Fincantieri SpA emphasises that unless there is concurrent delay affecting a contractor's completion date, the contractor will not be entitled to an extension of time.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

The English High Court decision in Saga Cruises BDF Ltd & Anor v Fincantieri SpA1 emphasises that unless there is concurrent delay affecting a contractor's completion date, the contractor will not be entitled to an extension of time.

What is concurrent delay?

"Concurrent delay" is a period of project overrun caused by two or more delay events. At least one delay is caused by an event usually defined in the construction contract as a "Relevant Event" or an "Excusable Delay" entitling the contractor to an extension of time eg delayed access to site. The other delay is caused by an event for which the contractor accepted the time and cost consequences eg a labour shortage. To be concurrent, the delays must be of approximately "equal causative potency"2 and be felt at the same time. The Malmaison3 decision stands as authority for the proposition that concurrent delay will entitle a contractor to an extension of time to the completion date, but not to its time-related

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from