Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2024

High Court Decision Considers Force Majeure And Sanctions Issues

The High Court has allowed a summary judgment application in relation to a breach of contract claim, finding that there was no realistic prospect of the defendants being able to rely on force majeure...

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

The High Court has allowed a summary judgment application in relation to a breach of contract claim, finding that there was no realistic prospect of the defendants being able to rely on force majeure and change of trade sanctions provisions in the agreement: Litasco SA v Der Mond Oil and Gas Africa SA & Anor (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 2866 (Comm).

The decision considers the difference between force majeure clauses triggered when a force majeure event "prevents" performance (ie renders it impossible) and those triggered where performance is "hindered" (which require something less than impossibility). It suggests that the courts may be slow to allow a party to rely on force majeure to suspend payment of an accrued debt obligation on the basis that paying the debt has been made more difficult. Even in the context of a clause that is triggered where performance is hindered, the court commented that a significant degree of difficulty in performance would be required – perhaps

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from