Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2016

Directors' Duties: The Proper Purpose Test

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

It is not enough that the directors have acted in what they believed to be in the best interests of the company.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

The Supreme Court has held that the proper purpose test applies to a decision by the directors of a public company to issue, under the terms of the company's articles, restriction notices which disenfranchise shareholders from voting. It is not enough that the directors have acted in what they believed to be in the best interests of the company.

Background

Part 22 of the Companies Act 2006 gives a public company the right to investigate who has an interest in its shares by sending out section 793 notices. Where a person fails to comply with a notice within a reasonable time, the company may apply to court for an order imposing restrictions on the shares. In practice, many public companies include provisions in their articles allowing the company itself to impose restrictions if a person fails to respond to a section 793 notice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from